I have interviewed 60 adult children of emotionally difficult parents, and the sadness that kept coming up was not that their parents failed them — it was that they still kept hoping they would change

A significant number of people are navigating adult life with a complicated parent relationship running quietly in the background. They have jobs, relationships, whole lives that appear fully functional from the outside. And yet, somewhere underneath all of that, there is still a part of them waiting. Waiting for the conversation to finally go differently. Waiting for acknowledgment that has not come. Hoping that this year, or maybe the next, something will shift.

Over the past couple of years, I have spoken with roughly 60 adult children of emotionally difficult parents. I went into those conversations expecting one kind of pain. I expected the biggest wounds to be about the specific things their parents did or failed to do: the control, the criticism, the emotional distance, the moments that should have gone another way. What I found, consistently, was something else.

The grief that came up most often was not about what happened. It was about what hadn’t stopped happening. It was the hoping.

What I expected to find

Most people, when they begin talking about a difficult parent, describe events. A specific memory. A pattern of behavior that shaped who they became. That was present in almost every conversation, and it matters. The specific things that happened are real and they leave real marks.

But when I asked about the present, the conversation usually shifted. The difficult parent was still in the picture. And the adult child, now fully grown, sometimes with children of their own, was still doing something in relation to that parent that looked a lot like hoping. Not all of them used that word at first. Some described it as giving the parent another chance. Others said they were just trying to keep the relationship going. A few said they were waiting to see if their parent might soften with age, with illness, with the arrival of grandchildren.

But underneath each of those framings, hope was what was actually running the engine.

Why hope stays so long

One of the less obvious things about painful parent relationships is that difficulty does not automatically reduce attachment. In many cases, unresolved need and ongoing hurt can actually intensify the pull toward resolution, the longing for things to be different.

The people I spoke with described versions of this: the pull toward the parent still felt real even when the relationship consistently disappointed. They knew, intellectually, that the dynamic was unlikely to change. They had often known this for years. And still, some part of them kept leaving a door open.

Suzanne Degges-White, Ph.D., a licensed counselor and professor at Northern Illinois University, has written about how adult children of emotionally limited parents can carry what she described as “an aching yearning for things to be different.” That is exactly the feeling most of the people I spoke with were living inside, often without having named it that clearly.

This kind of hope is not naive. It comes from one of the oldest and most fundamental human attachments. We are wired for connection to the people who raised us, and that wiring does not simply recalibrate when the relationship is difficult. The attachment remains. So does the hope that something in it might still shift.

What the hope actually costs

The cost of this hope showed up in ways the people I interviewed had not always made explicit to themselves. There was the low-grade monitoring, the way conversations with the parent were analyzed afterward for signs of progress or regression. There was the emotional preparation before visits, and the decompression needed after. There was the loop of trying again, being let down in the familiar way, and then recovering enough to try once more.

None of this is dramatic. That is part of what makes it so hard to see clearly. It does not look like suffering from the outside. It looks like staying connected with family. But the energy going into maintaining the hope is real, and it is not going anywhere else.

Degges-White has written that genuine acceptance of a difficult parent’s limitations may require that you “consciously set aside any hopes that your parent will change and acknowledge that they can never be, nor have they ever been, the ‘good enough’ parent that every child deserves.” Most of the people I spoke with arrived at something like this understanding slowly, over years, and not without grief.

What letting go looks like

Letting go of hope is not a single moment. The people who described having arrived somewhere more settled talked about it as a gradual process, not a decision they made once and stayed with. There are layers to it. There is the intellectual understanding that the parent is unlikely to change. And then there is the deeper, harder work of letting that understanding actually change how you move in relation to them.

See Also

What I kept hearing, from the people who had moved further along in this, was that the grief was real, and also that it was followed by something quieter and more stable. Less monitoring. Less mental energy spent on parsing what the parent meant by this or that interaction. Less of the specific kind of pain that comes from trying and being disappointed in a way that was entirely predictable.

The realization that came up most often was this: the hope was not really about the parent becoming someone different. It was about wanting to be the kind of person that parent could finally see. And working through that particular piece, understanding that the limitation was in the parent and not some failure of yours to make yourself lovable enough, is where the real shift tends to happen.

For people navigating this, Lindsay C. Gibson’s book Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents remains one of the most widely used resources on this subject and is worth reading alongside any therapeutic work.

A note on these conversations

I am not a psychologist, and these were not clinical interviews. They were honest, personal exchanges with people who were willing to share something real. The conversations were not uniform. Some people had worked through most of this in therapy. Others were still in the middle of it. Some maintained close relationships with their parents and had found a way to manage the ongoing disappointment. Others had stepped back significantly.

What was consistent was not a single outcome or a single path. What was consistent was the hope, and what it cost, and what became possible when people began to let themselves look at it directly.

If this is sitting close to something real for you, a therapist who works with early family relationships and attachment patterns is worth finding. This kind of thing is genuinely hard to work through on your own, and you do not have to.

Picture of Ainura Kalau

Ainura Kalau

Ainura was born in Central Asia, spent over a decade in Malaysia, and studied at an Australian university before settling in São Paulo, where she’s now raising her family. Her life blends cultures and perspectives, something that naturally shapes her writing. When she’s not working, she’s usually trying new recipes while binging true crime shows, soaking up sunny Brazilian days at the park or beach, or crafting something with her hands.

RECENT ARTICLES